The Godfather Notebook

The Godfather Notebook
By:Francis Ford Coppola
Published on 2016-12-20 by Simon and Schuster

THE PUBLISHING SENSATION OF THE YEAR FOR EVERY FILM FAN The never-before-published edition of Francis Ford Coppola’s notes and annotations on The Godfather novel by Mario Puzo reveals the story behind one of the world’s most iconic films. The most important unpublished work on one of the greatest films of all time, The Godfather, written before filming, by the man who wrote and directed it—Francis Ford Coppola, then only thirty-two years old—reveals the intense creative process that went into making this seminal film. With his meticulous notes and impressions of Mario Puzo’s novel, the notebook was referred to by Coppola daily on set while he directed the movie. The Godfather Notebook pulls back the curtain on the legendary filmmaker and the film that launched his illustrious career. Complete with an introduction by Francis Ford Coppola and exclusive photographs from on and off the set, this is a unique, beautiful, and faithful reproduction of Coppola’s original notebook. This publication will change the way the world views the iconic film—and the process of filmmaking at large. A must-have book of the season. Nothing like it has ever been published before

This Book was ranked at 16 by Google Books for keyword Arts.

Book ID of The Godfather Notebook's Books is VeqdDQAAQBAJ, Book which was written byFrancis Ford Coppolahave ETAG "4bJs7y58nkk"

Book which was published by Simon and Schuster since 2016-12-20 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781942872313 and ISBN 10 Code is 1942872313

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is true

Book which have "784 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryPerforming Arts

This Book was rated by Raters and have average rate at ""

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is true and in ePub is true

Book Preview

Don't you kind of loathe how we've joined the decadent stage of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty percent (or more) of the evaluations written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually nude and unabashed inside their variously powerful attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of pine (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the good ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were evenly plainspoke Do not you kind of hate how we have joined the decadent phase of Goodreads when possibly fifty percent (or more) of the opinions written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually bare and unabashed in their variously successful efforts at being arc, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you type of maple (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's happy druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were evenly plainspoken, merely functional, unpretentious, and -- especially else -- boring, boring, dull? Don't you kind of hate when persons state'don't you think in this manner or sense this way'in an endeavor to goad you both psychologically and grammatically in to agreeing using them? In the language of ABBA: I actually do, I actually do, I do(, I really do, I do). Well, as the interwebs is really a earth where yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the present (and with fetish porn), we are able to revisit days gone by in its inviolable presentness any moment we wish. Or at the least till this site finally tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's report on Macbeth in their entirety. I have destined it with a heavy rope and pulled it here for your perusal. (Please realize that many a sic are intended in these reviews.) its really complex and foolish! why cant we be reading like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at least that guide is good! There you have it. Refreshingly, not really a review written in one of many witch's sounds or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Merely a primal shout unleashed into the dark wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teenager, but I admire his power to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation having an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of the exact same play. You may'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'only at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... which might be the case, for several I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you do not want to learn is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks in the first place, if it was designed to be read, then it would have been a novel, not a play. Together with that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for every single character for a couple pages). None people had browse the play before. None folks wanted to learn it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. All this compounded to make me virtually hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also really can fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the writer and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to read plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to see a play then you have sinned and are going to hell, if you believe in hell. If not, you're planning to the DMV. I'm also fed up with whatever you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists together with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a note overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age whenever we are taught to respect each other's differences, it seems offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to expect others tokowtow in your small linguistic rules. Inventive manifestation will free of charge per se no matter how you are attempting to be able to shackle it. Which is your current sign, Aubrey. Around our thoughts and opinions, a engage in Macbeth ended up being your worste peice previously authored by Shakespeare, this also is saying a lot considering in addition, i understand his / her Romeo along with Juliet. Ontop involving it truly is witout a doubt fabulous plot of land, unrealistic figures plus absolutly discusting group of ethics, Shakespeare overtly shows Lovely lady Macbeth for the reason that true vilian while in the play. Thinking about jane is mearly the actual tone of voice inside the rear spherical plus Macbeth him or her self will be truely carrying out the particular gruesome criminal offenses, like murder along with scams, I would not discover why it's very uncomplicated to visualize in which Macbeth would be prepared to do very good instead of wicked only if her spouse had been much more possitive. I believe that your enjoy can be uterally unrealistic. But the examples below is in no way a ne as well as especially associated with classic e book reviewing. Although succinct and also without the annoying trend to help coyness and also cuteness, Jo's review alludes to some bitterness and so deep that it's inexpressible. A person imagines a handful of Signet Basic Models hacked to be able to sections with pruning shears within Jo's vicinity. I detest the following play. Because of this that will I can not actually give you any kind of analogies and also similes about just how much I hate it. An incrementally snarkier kind might have mentioned anything like...'I dispise that play such as a simile I am unable to show up with.' Not Jo. She addresses any live, undecorated reality not fit with regard to figurative language. In addition to there is no problem having that. One time within a great even though, when you buy neck-deep inside dandified pomo hijinks, it really is a nice wallow in the pig dog pen you're itchin'for. Appreciate it, Jo. I really like your ineffective gripping from similes in which won't be able to technique the actual bilious hatred in your heart. You are my own, and We are yours. Figuratively talking, involving course. And today here is our review: Macbeth by Bill Shakespeare is the greatest literary perform while in the Uk words, as well as anybody who disagrees is undoubtedly an asshole as well as a dumbhead.